Search Tags:

Categories:

Philosophy Movie



Uploaded by: rationalbeast
Video Description:
A video a friend and I made for our Philosophy class explaining John Locke and George Berkeley.


Tags for this video: Philosophy

Find more videos in the "Film" category
See more videos uploaded by rationalbeast

Related Videos
Philosophy in 2min (1)The History of Western Philosophy in Under 5 MinutesThree Minute Philosophy: Pythagoras
philosophy-in-2min-1.htmlphilosophy-in-2min-1.htmlphilosophy-in-2min-1.html
Locke's Argument Against Innate ideasGeorge Berkeley's IdealismThe Giants of Philosophy - Arthur Schopenhauer
philosophy-in-2min-1.htmlphilosophy-in-2min-1.htmlphilosophy-in-2min-1.html


Share This Video:       StumbleUpon       del.icio.us       Reddit       digg       Furl       Spurl       Simpy       YahooMyWeb


Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Comments for this video on YouTube
This was brilliant! ... ( 8 months ago by spookluke)
This was brilliant! Good work guys- If only there were more like it :D
lol nice ... ( 7 months ago by amarnamriju)
lol nice presentation
I love Heidegger. ... ( 7 months ago by gwmock)
I love Heidegger. I think you should have suggested Kant and then Husserl and then Heidegger, Sartre as dessert. But your summation is correct, the existentialists help us get past Descartes and his meditations. If you're into Phil of Science, I suggest Laudan, Kuhn, and Popper.
That's why ... ( 7 months ago by gwmock)
That's why Descartes changed 'Cogito Ergo Sum' to 'Cogito, Sum' (so as not to imply logical connection). He realized the mistake, and unfortunately people ran with the initial Cogito Ergo Sum, misunderstading Descartes position.
Oh, that's cute. ... ( 7 months ago by gwmock)
Oh, that's cute. Style 10 Substance meh
Uhh... we can't ... ( 7 months ago by gwmock)
Uhh... we can't every 'know' anything in an objective, absolute, certain sense. We can, however, make practical assumptions about the world that aid us in our dealings with it. Just because we can't 'know' something doesn't mean it is pointless to seek out knowledge, for the reason I mentioned above.
Very accurate ... ( 7 months ago by gwmock)
Very accurate representation of the argument, guys. Good jorb.
um not sure if u ... ( 6 months ago by wigglethemiddle)
um not sure if u meant to say this but Locke did not "start" the idea of a tabula rasa. Such notions were discussed in Aristotle and on to Aquinas
herakleitos is the ... ( 6 months ago by paralogon)
herakleitos is the best
This vid actually ... ( 6 months ago by blumac81)
This vid actually helped me a bit with my Philosophy class, thanks for posting it :)
cut em up old school ( 6 months ago by Philbo12345)
cut em up old school
who cares about ... ( 6 months ago by BREATHxOFxHEAVEN)
who cares about finding meaning and reasoning through logical methods?! im gonna go get on facebook and look at girls in bikinis that barely know me!
you are the ones ... ( 5 months ago by heimlich1017)
you are the ones destroying human intellect.
my comment was ... ( 5 months ago by BREATHxOFxHEAVEN)
my comment was meant to b a joke. its called sarcasm
Nice, a quick break ... ( 5 months ago by mtheoryrules)
Nice, a quick break down that is easy to digest and yet still useful on the as it defines the points of contention.
Five stars for the turbo mode berkley break down.
Nice. I read ... ( 5 months ago by happyman)
Nice. I read Sophie's World when I was 14. That only the time Philosophy made sense. =P
I'd recommend ... ( 5 months ago by talas7)
I'd recommend Ryle's Concept of Mind, rather than dealing with the ontological commitments of the phenomenologists. Oh, and Sartre was a Cartesian (Being and Nothingness shows this).
I buy into ... ( 5 months ago by hmv12321)
I buy into Cartesian dualism much either. Have you read G
ödel, Escher, and Bach by Douglas Hofstadter?
Imagine the God of ... ( 4 months ago by alanejackson)
Imagine the God of the Bible is WORDS. Not a god like Zeus
And your relationship with WORDS is your relationshipe with the God of Moses and Jesus. The cause and effect of WORDS in our lives/subconscious. John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. Jesus and Beds Recognizing the connection/association between
Jesus and the mass utilization of beds, Before the word "sleep", they used the word "dead. Raising the dead, meant raising the sleeping
This is f***** ... ( 3 months ago by NeoConvert)
This is f***** great! High praise, seriously. I just taught subjective idealism yesterday, and I think I'm going to show this to my students tomorrow. The Locke-Berkeley transition is one of my favorite to teach, hands down. The moderns are great. Thanks again for a great presentation.
I'm confused as to ... ( 3 months ago by NeoConvert)
I'm confused as to who this comment is directed toward. Can I ask? Who mentioned phenomenologists? And what are their "ontological commitments"?
DANG! ( 3 months ago by hiphopisntacrime)
DANG!
at first i was uhh ... ( 3 months ago by aaronandeddieshow)
at first i was uhh oh...but yeah its good..
v.v.good! ( 1 week ago by Katiarix)
v.v.good!



Tell a friend:


URL 
Embed Code