Search Tags:

Categories:

National Guard Confiscating Guns in New Orleans



Uploaded by: wonderfunk
Video Description:
Just what the title says.


Tags for this video: amendment constitution guard guns hurricane katrina national new orleans second seizure

Find more videos in the "News" category
See more videos uploaded by wonderfunk

Related Videos
Re: NRA: The Untold Story of Gun Confiscation After KatrinaMy Wife -vs- the Desert Eagle .50The Great New Orleans Gun Grab
re-nra-the-untold-story-of-gun-confiscation-after-katrina.htmlre-nra-the-untold-story-of-gun-confiscation-after-katrina.htmlre-nra-the-untold-story-of-gun-confiscation-after-katrina.html
New Orleans ExposedKatrina forceful evictions and rights violationsYou're In The Army National Guard Now!
re-nra-the-untold-story-of-gun-confiscation-after-katrina.htmlre-nra-the-untold-story-of-gun-confiscation-after-katrina.htmlre-nra-the-untold-story-of-gun-confiscation-after-katrina.html


Share This Video:       StumbleUpon       del.icio.us       Reddit       digg       Furl       Spurl       Simpy       YahooMyWeb


Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Comments for this video on YouTube
paratrooper, in ... ( 1 week ago by theEuropean78)
paratrooper, in regards to your comment about how its easier to control people without guns, you've made a good point. It is easier to control people who are disarmed. That works fine in a country like yours that never had the balls to kick your British masters out. So, you really can't understand what true liberty is...a free man is not supposed to be controlled, would never allow himself to be controlled.
so have there been ... ( 1 week ago by paratrooper6)
so have there been any more massacres since then?
So you would rather have guns and people die than no guns and people live?
Ummmm, what the ... ( 1 week ago by paratrooper6)
Ummmm, what the heck. 'it's a republic'. Being a republic doesn't nessecaraly make a country good. North Korea is a republic, but hell, I wouldn't want to live there. America is a democracy, just not the best one.
Hmmm, I think ... ( 1 week ago by paratrooper6)
Hmmm, I think you'll find that there were actualy a few rebellions. However, we did not have to resort to killing people to gain our freedom, and atained it in a much more honourable way. Also, don't start trying to talk me down about freedom as I live in a more democratic country than you do, and our system isn't broken like yours.
Didn't Australia ... ( 1 week ago by vursitis)
Didn't Australia just get done confiscating weapons from everyone?
No I think that you ... ( 1 week ago by paratrooper6)
No I think that you will find that it is you who made the decision to buy another gun. I did not force any decision on you, and it was your choice, with your complete free will to make that choice. So don't go saying that I 'made' you buy a gun.
Well said. ( 1 week ago by vursitis)
Well said.
the funny thing is ... ( 1 week ago by paratrooper6)
the funny thing is that you seem to give credibility to the general global opinion that Americans, in general, are stupid, as you seem to be stupid yourself.
We invented medicaly viable penicillin.
Metal Storm.
Black box.
Spray on skin.
The Winged Keel :P
Polymer banknote (much superiour to your crappy paper money)
Dethridge wheel.
We also made the first full length movie (70 minutes)
and the pacemaker.
Those are just some inventions from Australia you yobbo.
Array ( 1 week ago by paratrooper6)
??????
In Australia we are allowed to own firearms. However you need a liscence, no criminal record, and need to store the ammo and gun in different locations. It is illeal to own semi automatic rifles or fully automatic weapons. I think, would expect, that the laws regarding storage or weapons and ammunition are different for the country areas.
However I am no expert on our gun laws.
Oh okay, so ... ( 1 week ago by vursitis)
Oh okay, so basically the same here. (our laws vary from state to state as well.) Some are ALOT more lenient than others. I have just never been successfully able to get a real answer to that question. So many websites have told me numerous things about Australian law.
Explain how your ... ( 5 days ago by RebelWrestler45)
Explain how your country is more democratic than ours. And our system seems to be working pretty damn well for the last two hundred years. Anyways, the right to self defense is an inalienable natural right; the legislative and judicial systems of Britain have made it a crime.
that's why ... ( 5 days ago by RebelWrestler45)
that's why Britain's and Australia's violent crime rates went up after their respective gun bans right? because less guns equals less crime?
ok, the voting ... ( 5 days ago by paratrooper6)
ok, the voting system
1. You don't even need 50% + 1 vote to be elected, thus not showing the full intentions of voters
2. The electoral collge distorts the true number of votes for any candidate, because most states have a winner takes all system. Eg. George Bush won in 2000 when Al Gore had 200,000 more votes than him
3. There is no central, non political authority which governs elections and makes sure that they are fair and equal, allowing gerrymandering and other rigging to happen
Yep, a murder rate ... ( 5 days ago by paratrooper6)
Yep, a murder rate of 1.28 per 100,000 really compares to a murder rate of 5.7 per 100,000.
and the list goes ... ( 5 days ago by paratrooper6)
and the list goes on.
Gerrymandering is ... ( 5 days ago by RebelWrestler45)
Gerrymandering is used to give minorities representation at a local level. The electoral college helps nullify the moron factor. The founding fathers wanted politicians to be proprietors of their conscience, not mouthpieces of their constituency (see Burke's essay on Trusteeship representative democracy). There is a difference between representational democracy and direct democracy; one isn't necessarily more "democratic" than the other. The state electoral comm. (non-partisan) oversees voting.
Gerrymander-This ... ( 5 days ago by paratrooper6)
Gerrymander-This expression has its origins in American politics and refers to a situation in chich electoral boundaries are drawn so as to maximise one partys electoral chances, and minimise opposing partys chances.
I'll also think that you'll find that the electoral comm only oversees voting, and not the drawing up of boundaries electorate, ballot cards, and location of polling booths.
The moron factor???
4. The executive is ... ( 5 days ago by paratrooper6)
4. The executive is not a part of the legislature and sits seperatly from it. This means that the executive does not come under much scrutiny from the house and is not asked questions directly from the opposision. Also, secretaries (ministers for us) are not elected representatives but are appointed by the President, meaning that they do not have an electoral responsibility to anyone apart from the president.
I know exactly what ... ( 5 days ago by RebelWrestler45)
I know exactly what gerrymandering is. The fact is that no state has been won in a presidential election by means of gerrymandering. The state legislature oversees district boundaries. The location of polling booths is usually at schools. Also, a lot of states don't have ballot cards; its done electronically.
You are all idiots ... ( 4 days ago by kevinTurner187)
You are all idiots there's 300 million people in the US and proably 400-500 million any given day and theres an average 12,000-1600 homocides in the US a year what is that .001 percent of the population. Whats britians popluatiopn like 50 million come on guys the US ios ranked 155th on the most violent countries heres a hint theirs 180 countries. ENOUGH with the GUNS CAUSE CRIME.
Array ( 3 days ago by ski2exs)
@paratro. . . .
Nah. . you're not even close. Tell me something. . .what does Victoria's ban on swords say about the violent nature of it's inhabitants. . . You ban your swords. . I'll keep my guns! BTW. . .next time you see an American. . .thank him for your not having to live underneigth imperialistic Japane
se rule. Or. . .are you too ignorant and lame to be thankful for that? From. . .a Good 'Ole gun totin' redneck!
Hmmm, I am ... ( 3 days ago by paratrooper6)
Hmmm, I am thankfull that America entered the war (finaly, and only after they had been attacked). However, it seems that I am more well informed than you are, because Japan had no intention of invading Australia, party because they just wanted the Pacific and China, and we're just too freggin big :P
Also, another interesting fact is that the Australian Militia were the first to secure a land victory against the Japanese, where the Marines and all other countries had failed beforehand.
It's called ... ( 3 days ago by ski2exs)
It's called isolationism. . .something GB should have stood by before insuring Poland.
Interesting perception on Imperialistic Japan. . .One could have said the same about Fascist Germany. Seems they made claims of no further land claims after Austria. . .I mean the Sudetenland. . . uh. . . I mean Danzig. . . Oh. .. you get the point.
Just so we're ... ( 2 days ago by ski2exs)
Just so we're straight. .Hitler started war!
He didn't have diplomatic sense to understand what Chamberlain was saying. He was basically content at Danzig being returned to Germany, however blind to Nazi European ambitions. Imperialistic Japan however was no better. It was always about 'lebensraum' deviod of the nation at question. For o
ne to think that Austrailia safe after the initial 'map' is shortsightedness. A big mistake was GB's refusal at USA's yerning to cont pact with Japan



Tell a friend:


URL 
Embed Code