Evo 9 - 0 to Top
Uploaded by: atewichasha
Video Description:
Evo 9 - 0 to Top
Tags for this video: atakum drag evo evo9 istanbul lancer mitsubishi rolling samsun turkey
Find more videos in the "Autos" category
See more videos uploaded by atewichasha
| Mitsubishi Lancer Evo IX Drifting | Evo 9 GT35R vs. 2000 Corvette | Evo 9 vs Evo 9 Vs Cop |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Evo 9 & STI - AMSTV | Lancer Evolution 9 JIC Magic Titanium Exhaust | Evo 9 vs. Fiat Coupe Turbo |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Tell a friend:














More cylinders have more torque as there is usually more capicity (larger amount of A/F mixture) being burnt at the same time creating more torque.
Inline fours are usually lower capacity than V8's...thus according to the equation..Power = Torque * RPM...you will have to increase RPM in order to gain power in a smaller capacity engine...as torque is limited...a way of creating torque is Forced Induction... Also it is easier to balance a Inlin
e 4 that a V8.
Then you also have to consider cam design (timing, lift and duration) determines where the power is produced. Thus why Variable Valve Timing and lift systems like Honda's VTEC were so successful at producing linear and high end power without sacrificing drivability.
I was referring to reliability at high rpm.
An evo would generally have better 0-60 if launched properly due to two main reasons...AWD provides better launches compared to FWD/RWD and the mustangs having larger engines (more torque) would be better in LATER GEARS such as 4th, 5th and 6th. I4's are usually fast over 0-60 but are average over
the 1/4 Mile Runs. Put the Evo and Mustang on a track and there is no competition. Your reply sounds like a typical rednecks uneducated, unfounded bias opinion...
read some facts of specs of an evo vs those 2 shit boxes you spoke off. hp is not everything.