How Evolution Works Part 5- Natural Selection



Uploaded by: DonExodus2
Video Description:
I discuss natural selection and what it is, and what it is not.
HA, 40 seconds of end buffer, take THAT youtube! Music: Adagio in G Minor (Albinoni) CDKs video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=26dwfZIqfco


Tags for this video: creationism darwin dawkins design evolution intelligent mutations natural of selection theory

Find more videos in the "Tech" category
See more videos uploaded by DonExodus2

Related Videos
A Question Of The Origins (Creation/Evolution) (Part 1 of 3)Evolution vs Creation : # 9 Natural SelectionHow the eye evolved - National Geo
a-question-of-the-origins-creationevolution-part-1-of-3.htmla-question-of-the-origins-creationevolution-part-1-of-3.htmla-question-of-the-origins-creationevolution-part-1-of-3.html
Evolutionists are Exposed and ViciousThe Evolution Hoax- Part 1Intelligent Design Arguments Refuted
a-question-of-the-origins-creationevolution-part-1-of-3.htmla-question-of-the-origins-creationevolution-part-1-of-3.htmla-question-of-the-origins-creationevolution-part-1-of-3.html


Share This Video:       StumbleUpon       del.icio.us       Reddit       digg       Furl       Spurl       Simpy       YahooMyWeb


Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Comments for this video on YouTube
« opposite is true ... ( 2 months ago by XGralgrathor)
« opposite is true for those that develop positive mutations » Actually, the process will work - on a limited scale - without mutations. Recombination of existing genes ensures a distribution of allele frequencies that allow selection to act upon a diverse set of combinations of heritable traits.
very true, I was ... ( 2 months ago by garith21)
very true, I was rather generic in the general statement, thanks for making it more refined.
keep fooling ... ( 2 months ago by arrogantv)
keep fooling yourselves with evolution and guessing at the process of evolution and the origin of life. It must feel crappy to think that Dawkins is such a twit to say those things!
. . Such devices could not have been put together by chance. And of course, no sensible scientist ever said they could. (From "Richard Dawkins Explains His Latest Book,"
htt p : / / richarddawkins . net / main Page . p h p ? bodyPage = article_ body . php & id =170)
"You rightly say ... ( 2 months ago by arrogantv)
"You rightly say that random mutation is NOT a good explanation for the evolution of giraffes' necks or, indeed, of anything else!" (From "Richard Dawkins: Frequently Asked Questions," htt p : / / w ww . simonyi . ox . ac . uk / dawkins / FAQs . s h tml)
lol continuing to ... ( 2 months ago by garith21)
lol continuing to quote mine dawkins despite the fact that it's pointed out precisely what he meant, because the claim that the diversity of life is only a result of random "chance" is only a claim made by your side, no scientist makes the claim that you claim that they represent. You're only showing your complete idiocy and lack of any inquiry of any kind
"I don't quote mine ... ( 2 months ago by garith21)
"I don't quote mine, I have the exact references to each quote." you do realize that quote mining is taking a quote and presenting it as if it supports your position when in fact the person stating it is saying nothing of the sort and you are actively distorting their point of view. You are a liar in your statement that you don't quote mine, and in your dishonest tactic of quote mining.
if you want an ... ( 2 months ago by garith21)
if you want an example of a quote mine and why it's considered a dishonest tactic here's a quote from you. "...your morals are determined by you, and really there is no accountability" you said it, you didn't mean it the way it's stated here, but you consider this an honest tactic?
won't it be hard ... ( 2 months ago by garith21)
won't it be hard for Harun Yahya to debate from Jail?
You are a spamming ... ( 1 month ago by jhbbunch)
You are a spamming liar. I've shown his lie elsewhere. You know that he continues on to say the selective adaptation of mutations is the correct explanation. If you lie, you lose. Now go crawl away, find a hole, lie in it and die of shame you creationist liar.
Rest of quote: " ... ( 1 month ago by jhbbunch)
Rest of quote: " The correct explanation -- and it is indeed an excellently satisfying one -- is Darwinian natural selection. Darwinian natural selection is emphatically NOT the same thing as random mutation. Although random mutation does play a role in the theory, natural selection itself is the most important ingredient, and natural selection is the exact OPPOSITE of random." Somebody ban this dirt-ass ignoarant lieing creotard.
Again you lieing ... ( 1 month ago by jhbbunch)
Again you lieing twit, he is talking about chance not being a viable explanation, not the TOE. He goes on to say a few lines after that quote mine of yours: "Natural selection is so stunningly powerful and elegant, it not only explains the whole of life, it raises our consciousness and boosts our confidence in science's future ability to explain everything else." BTW, you must be the author of Darwinism-Watch because it seems to be nothing but these kinds of quote mine lies.
Admit it you are a ... ( 1 month ago by jhbbunch)
Admit it you are a Harun Yahya retard aren't you? His sites use these same shameless lies.
« "Natural ... ( 1 month ago by XGralgrathor)
« "Natural selection is so stunningly powerful and elegant, it not only explains the whole of life, it raises our consciousness and boosts our confidence in science's future ability to explain everything else." » Which is true to a certain extent, but also rather arrogant. However, the quote sple
ndidly illustrates arrogantv's ability to shamelessly lie where the proof for his lying is visible to everybody.
Lies? Why would ... ( 1 month ago by arrogantv)
Lies? Why would someone lie about the fossil record. It is there for anyone that wants to check it. What is a lie is evolution. After all it is only a theory never proven by the fossil record. If mutations don't account for it, you are saying natural selection does? LOL That is a myth and an absurd lie. One day you guys will look back at this theory and see how lame and illogical it is. It is nothing but a pagan tool to keep creation out of the picture.
Natural Selection, ... ( 1 month ago by arrogantv)
Natural Selection, please define it for us and give us a mechanism of how a limb turns into a wing? you can't, you can only guess right? There isn't a single transitional fossil, either due to mutation or random selection.
nature is unfair ... ( 1 month ago by theabomation)
nature is unfair the strongest doesn't always live!
Humans are ... ( 1 month ago by NfnitEcomplx)
Humans are constituents of our environment, and hence, we make up a part of our own normal environment. Our ability and decision to use medicinal knowledge does not disable natural selection, but puts one aspect of our environmental pressures directly under our own control. Advances in medicine expand and enhance this control and conversely our responsibilities therein.
uh you might want ... ( 1 month ago by garith21)
uh you might want to look up evolution it's dependent on mutations for a random factor and natural selection to guide the population as a whole. You keep trying to attack them separately when science doesn't even say as such to begin with, look up the information theory to see why this is new information.
you're right it's ... ( 1 month ago by garith21)
you're right it's not either mutation or natural selection (which isn't random) it's both, random mutations supply the fuel for selection, selection gives the guiding force for the population. Your profuse lack of understanding is astounding.
« Why would someone ... ( 1 month ago by XGralgrathor)
« Why would someone lie about the fossil record. It is there for anyone that wants to check it. What is a lie is evolution. » These three sentences in quick succession can only mean one thing. « After all it is only a theory » Yep.
ur new mic sounds ... ( 1 month ago by cupilix)
ur new mic sounds nice altho the sound seems to be lower than the last one. i hope this fact isnt very dramatic for your viewers.
You gotta love his ... ( 1 month ago by ChristianSojourner)
You gotta love his bashing of religion and Christianty (in the pictures) while talking about Science. That's why Science is so much under heat, because people like this guy have to throw in their anti-religion while speaking science.
Why not just speak science and not try to point out how stupid religious people are in doing so? Like Dawkins, he preaches against Intelligent Design in schools but bashes Religion when talking to children about Science. Pure hypocrisy.
Except for my ... ( 1 month ago by DonExodus2)
Except for my videos explaining my belief in God... What pictures bash religion, and not fundamentalism? You have confused religion with zealotry...
Another great video ... ( 2 weeks ago by ReasonablySpeaking)
Another great video! I have subscribed and am trying to watch all your previous ones. Keep it up!



Tell a friend:


URL 
Embed Code