Jab'o Starks & Clyde Stubblefield Funky Drummers
Uploaded by: ToTe4444
Video Description:
Extracted from the DVD "Soul Of The Funky Drummers"... Jab'o Starks & Clyde Stubblefield, courtesy of Drummerworld.
Tags for this video: clyde drum drummer drummers drums funk funky jabo starks stubblefield
Find more videos in the "Music" category
See more videos uploaded by ToTe4444
| Clyde Stubblefield/ Funky Drummer | Clyde Stubblefield (Funky Drummer) Playing "I Got You " | Stephan Suhar - James Brown - Funky Drummer |
 |  |  |
| The Funky Drummer Clyde Stubblefield | I Got You (I Feel Good) :: Funk Drumming | Funky Drummer |
 |  |  |
Share This Video:
Comments for this video: Show || Hide
| Comments for this video on YouTube |
| It takes years of ... ( 2 months ago by MEGAMIGA) |
| It takes years of hard work to master musical theory, as well as an instrument. On the other hand, anyone can read the user manual of a sampler. Will this turn them into a musician? Would have Miles Davis, John Coltrane or Vivaldi revolutionised music if they had used blank drumloops? Be honest. As for Rock drummers not having the right feeling to play Funk, I agree. It's like many people trying to play "Little Wing" with a straight feeling... :-) |
| Miles did use ... ( 2 months ago by cantstopwinning) |
| Miles did use drumloops jackass. Listen to some the examples I've given you before you discredit them. |
| Yes he did... On ... ( 2 months ago by MEGAMIGA) |
| Yes he did... On his ultimate album, which was... Rap... Mind you, he did not compose it; it was produced by Easy Mo Bee. Furthermore, this album was released in 1991 and by then, Miles had already done his revolution... I'm sorry, I should have developed a tad, this would had spared you the term "jackass"... Good night. |
| Miles used drum ... ( 2 months ago by cantstopwinning) |
| Miles used drum machines and samples on Tutu in 1986, but you could still argue that technology played a strong hand in the success of the way Bitches Brew turned out... those hour long studio jams were painstakingly edited down into a listenable form. The fact that it was tape and not protools is neither here nor there. |
| Oh yes, I forgot ... ( 2 months ago by MEGAMIGA) |
| Oh yes, I forgot Tutu. As for editing tape... Well, first you cannot make a mistake, for once the tape is cut, it's hard to put it back together. Second ProTools allows you to modify and move each note if it is wrongly placed... Well, music is great because it is NOT 100% perfect. If you erase the human element from art, there is no more art, is there? Because of ProTools, someone who cannot sing, can now sing in tune but where it sincerity??? Hence my coment that technology killed music. |
| Technology has ... ( 1 month ago by whatshendrix) |
| Technology has killed music? You are very ignorant my friend... Technology has spawned a large number of genres (all descent music, I don't mean that techno/gabba/house or whatever else dance-music garbage). In the last 10 years there has been evermore critically acclaimed electronic classical music, and you can't say anything to that. Wise up before you start talking rubbish like that... |
| Copy? Are you ... ( 1 month ago by whatshendrix) |
| Copy? Are you serious!Have you not heard of layering, slicing, etc... You DON'T know anything about sample based music. That's like saying - drummers are ok, but it's not original, because they haven't invented the drums. People who use slicers, granulizers, and multiple effects on the drums make something completely new from someone else's work, and it's just as original and has just as much feeling and flavor. The stuff you said is so ignorant that it makes me embarrassed to talk about it. |
| Well, talk about ... ( 1 month ago by whatshendrix) |
| Well, talk about little wing - Jimi never learned music theory... And learning theory doesn't make you a good musician either. It's not reading the manual that lets you make original music, it's what you do after you know how to use it... Reading the manual is just the same as reading musical theory. You don't just lack knowledge and appreciation, you lack intelligence. No offense, man, but - GET REAL!!! |
| True but there is a ... ( 1 month ago by MEGAMIGA) |
| True but there is a difference between a sampler manual and musical theory, which is HUGE! Using a manual is learning how to use a device, while music theory is learning rules, assimilating them, then creating something... As for lacking knowledge and intelligence, well... I know, I'm sooooooo stupid, I should make Techno or Rap... |
| Pushing buttons ... ( 1 month ago by MEGAMIGA) |
| Pushing buttons does not need as much work as learning, hours after hours, an instrument. And since sample-basic "music" is so creative, then why people who make it need samples in the first place? They should be able to create from scratch without using someone else's work. |
| What do you mean by ... ( 1 month ago by MEGAMIGA) |
| What do you mean by electronic classical music? Things like Frank Zappa's Jazz from Hell or Mothers of Prevention? |
| ARE YOU FOR REAL o_ ... ( 1 month ago by whatshendrix) |
| ARE YOU FOR REAL o____X Pushing buttons is not what sample based music is about - it needs musical theory too, AND you have to know how to work with a vast number of electronic instruments (you can even create your own instruments). Pulling the strings on the guitar and plugging it into an amp is easy, so does that mean that Jimi Hendrix is not a musician? And why do drummers need DRUMS in the first place?!?!? Why can't they make music, without the drums? |
| Everyone can learn ... ( 1 month ago by whatshendrix) |
| Everyone can learn to play the piano, but there is ONLY ONE BEETHOVEN!!! And musical theory has NOTHING at all to do with RULES!!! Being a great musician is not about having a lot of knowledge, it's about expressing ideas through sound, and the means you use are IRRELEVANT!!! |
| Plaing music is ... ( 1 month ago by MEGAMIGA) |
| Plaing music is about using one's brain AND one's body. A musician needs an absolute control over their body. This is absent in programmations, isn't it? As for playing the guitar being easy... You're not a guitarist yourself, are you? Drums can't record a bit a music and play it without a human actually playing it. Polyrhythms are incredibly complex. And yes, I am for real, I am no script-bot :) |
| Sampler theory is ... ( 1 month ago by whatshendrix) |
| Sampler theory is learning rules, assimilating them, then creating something... How is that different from music theory, dipshit? I'm done with you. YOU ARE RETARDED (no joke), IGNORANT, YOU CONTRADICT YOURSELF, AND YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT CREATING MUSIC!!! |
| I AM a guitarist, ... ( 1 month ago by whatshendrix) |
| I AM a guitarist, drummer, percussionist and a producer... If drums can't play without a human, CAN A SAMPLER PLAY WITHOUT A HUMAN INTERACTING WITH IT? And music is not about having control over your body (and it doesn't need your whole body, either), it's not a sport, is it? And there is no such word as "programmations", frenchy... Again your lack of knowledge... |
| Yes it has. The way ... ( 1 month ago by MEGAMIGA) |
| Yes it has. The way scales, chords and thus harmony are created, is a set of rules. Now, people like Vivaldi created their own scales to great effect but, indeed, not every musician is Vivaldi... I agree that knowledge doesn't make a great musician. It takes genius. And as Stravinski said, genius is 90% work, 10% talent. Technology allows people to put sounds together without work, which is why it's bad. As for the means employed, I do believe they're relevant. Music is human. |
| You know what I ... ( 1 month ago by MEGAMIGA) |
| You know what I mean. As a drummer, you HAVE to keep playing. A sampler can play loops over and over again. And so playing an instrument is not about having control? Comming from a drummer, this is funny :-) It's programming, I know, sorry. |
| You have to keep ... ( 1 month ago by whatshendrix) |
| You have to keep playing, but that's not what music is about. And you can play with a sampler (I know I've done that a million times). For example programming music is the same as composing music - you don't have to play the music if you compose it, and not anyone can compose stuff like the Moonlight Sonata by Beethoven. You think that it's really easy, but it's not, and it offers a lot of variety and samplers are a tool used to create musical ideas the same as any other musical instrument. |
| My point is, stuff ... ( 1 month ago by MEGAMIGA) |
| My point is, stuff like samplers or sequencers lack the human touch, the human feeling because they play notes from their CPU, not from their heart :-) Now, if people like sample-based music, it's their problem, not mine. I have a collection of more than 850 albums. As a consequence, I can live in musical autarchy... By the way, what kind of music do you play? |
| I know what your ... ( 1 month ago by whatshendrix) |
| I know what your point is. But you write music with the sampler - the sampler can't play without a human. You tell the sampler what to play - you are the creator, not the sampler. I play in a rock band and we play everything :D And I compose and produce a ton of genres such as classical guitar/piano, breaks, ambient, IDM... Even music for GameBoy ^^ Anything at all - depending on what I feel, I get into a different genre. |
| Creating chords and ... ( 1 month ago by whatshendrix) |
| Creating chords and arpeggios is the same as composing beats or melodies with a sampler. You need to know how to do it, and you compose what sounds are to be played - isn't that effort? What Stravinski meant is that you have to keep doing what you do, not that you have to put a lot of effort into ONE thing. He meant that you have to play and compose music for a long time if you are to become a genius. The great classic composers put very little effort + a lot of feeling! |
| mira que son ... ( 1 month ago by ToTe4444) |
| mira que son mongolico peleandose por pelotudece e... estoy yanky cagado... miren el video y dejense de joder XD |
| Yes Boss! ( 3 weeks ago by FootSoledier) |
| Yes Boss! |
Tell a friend: