300 This Is Sparta
Uploaded by: louie9588
Video Description:
Madness?
This is Sparta!
Tags for this video: 300 Earth Is Madness Messenger Offering Persia Persian Poop Sparta Spartans This Water Xerxes
Find more videos in the "Film" category
See more videos uploaded by louie9588
| 300 (2007) - Best Fight Scenes | this is sparta slow | SPARTANS !!! WHAT IS YOUR PROFESSION ? -spartans' profession |
 |  |  |
| This Is Sparta! ~Another Techno Remix~ | 300 SPARTANS | This is Sparta. Full scene. |
 |  |  |
Share This Video:
Comments for this video: Show || Hide
| Comments for this video on YouTube |
| Genghis was such ... ( 1 day ago by SAITOXIII) |
| Genghis was such charismatic and a genius character, more people followed him and his army grew in number, yet, the Mongols were the most fierce out of his multi-cultured empire. Hence the large but trained army which Alxander failed to possess. Genghis dies victorious and his sons continued his legacy successfully, Alexander dies after losing against a mere tribe in India, and his Empire falls immediately after that. Mongol lasted and grew AFTER genghis, he planned it all. Alexander was history |
| The Germanic Tribes ... ( 1 day ago by SAITOXIII) |
| The Germanic Tribes were in fact fleeing from the eastern fronts due to Mongolian invasion. Only Mongol succeeded in conquering Russia in winter in history. And most of all, there was only one freaking mongolian general at poland against many allied generals of the west, still more westerners died. West feared the mongols as mentioned in their history books, yet the mongols feared no one, thus the west was not even considered a threat. Mongols only feared themselves, their rivals, their brothers |
| Your historical ... ( 1 day ago by SAITOXIII) |
| Your historical accounts about the Mongols are utterly erroneous. I know Alexander was "great", but he was blatantly defeated against the Indians. He did lose. Genghis khan lost once in his childhood, but he never lost after adulthood and succeeded his empire later to be known as a world empire. It is also impossible the Mongols feared germanic tribes for the Mongols were far more battle hardened and war hungry. Europe didn't want to fight the Mongols! Seriously, read before you preach... |
| that is one deep ... ( 21 hours ago by uchihaitachi564) |
| that is one deep hole ha.ha.ha.ha :) |
| THIS IS AMUURICA!! ( 20 hours ago by JDKmedeng) |
| THIS IS AMUURICA!! |
| I suggest you read ... ( 19 hours ago by Boukephalos1) |
| I suggest you read my young man. Alexander never lost to the Indians. The Mongols did worry about the Germanic Tribes. You see Castles and walls did present a problem for horse armies. |
| really great movie ... ( 13 hours ago by bang99) |
| really great movie one of kind |
| Hail the white man ( 12 hours ago by XSpanishRockHeavyX) |
| Hail the white man |
| "Alexander never ... ( 12 hours ago by SAITOXIII) |
| "Alexander never lost to the Indians", brother... Alexander losing to the Indians is one of the pivotal and notable moments of his LEGACY! You blatantly ignore, better yet attempt to disprove the historically approved account. Mongols destroyed Beijing (one of the most fortified cities), they crushed Baghdad (again a massive fortified city). Mongols adopted Chinese siege warfare (which was most advanced in the world). Mongol cavalry was famous, but were never used in sieges. |
| Before I even talk ... ( 12 hours ago by SAITOXIII) |
| Before I even talk about history. Think logically, the Mongols took over "The Chinese Dynasty" who had one of the world's most powerful military, most advanced advanced technology, etc. They took over millions of fortifications (including the Persian fortifications which even the crusades failed to compete). Obviously the Mongols had no problems commencing siege warfare with Europe, who had smaller castles and thinner walls than the other powerful empires that the Mongols defeated. |
| Guys why don't you ... ( 11 hours ago by Varonos21) |
| Guys why don't you whrite about Greeks.The bravest and the best sholdiers and Philosofs!Alexander,Leonidas,Miltiadis,Periklis,Themistoklis.Also remember from our modern history Kolokotronis,Makrigianis,Mpotsatis,Karaiskakis,Papaflesas,Athanasios Diakos and many others!Further the Philosofs,Architects and others!Dont't forget that the Dimokracy was invented from the Athenians not from the illuminators that copy Klisthemis and Periklis!!! |
| Kahn and Alexander ... ( 11 hours ago by NOTOLONG) |
| Kahn and Alexander had one thing common. They were tyrants who forced the will of their Empires on others using the sword and slaughtered any who opposed them. The irony being that people today who praise them out of some false sense of pride are the same people who complain about colonialism today. Kahn, Alexander are up there with the Ceasers, Napolean and Hitler. They all forced their rule on others by violent means. |
| Amazingly your the ... ( 8 hours ago by Boukephalos1) |
| Amazingly your the only one in the world that says Alexander the Great lost a battle. |
| Which world do you ... ( 7 hours ago by SAITOXIII) |
| Which world do you come from? The Distant Galaxy of Retardia? In my world, notably known as "EARTH", Alexander the Great lost a battle, which was also his final battle. It's unbelievable how people like you don't even attempt to SEARCH whether you're right or wrong. Go ahead, and tell me what it says in books, or films, or sites, and genuinely tell me that Alexander never lost a battle. Alexander WANTED India, and he failed, obviously because he LOST. You don't FAIL if you WIN understand? LOGIC |
| No foolish boy he ... ( 7 hours ago by Boukephalos1) |
| No foolish boy he defeated the Indian king and then because of his men he went back. You should read sources not take things from your little mind. |
| There were millions ... ( 7 hours ago by SAITOXIII) |
| There were millions of Indian Kings you fool. One of the reasons were because they were mostly scattered around as tribes and small communities. Alexander fought these small tribes one by one until he was finally shot through his breast plate by one of the later tribes he encountered. His men didn't want to fight, and his empire stopped growing after that. Now Genghis Khan kept growing, and his men followed him till his death. Good generals have good soldiers, Alexander lost it. |
| I get it weido you ... ( 7 hours ago by Boukephalos1) |
| I get it weido you love Genghis Khan because your an asian. Once that happened Alexanders soldiers killed everyone of the people in the city. But I digress he killed all the Indian tribes on the way back after his wound. But the Indian king was the largest in India at the time. No child he never lost a Battle, Genghis Khan did. Live with it. |
| Grow up you racist ... ( 6 hours ago by SAITOXIII) |
| Grow up you racist idiot, what has me being "asian" have to do anything with this Topic. It shows how your culture have a lack of respect and honor which we endow even to enemies. Fair enough, he might have not lost a battle in itself, but he was not have been able to conquer India, or the amount Genghis has achieved in both power and land. Alexander lost pretty much everything, and his empire didnt last a bit. There's just too many things Genghis achieved more than Alexander. There's no excuse |
| ah,the racist mo, I ... ( 5 hours ago by Boukephalos1) |
| ah,the racist mo, I was referring to your reasoning for your error and your obvious prejudice that's all, I know the historical sources and you called me retard, I couldn't let that unanswered. yes he did conquer a larger land mass, but as I have told you his Calvary were in the hundreds of thousands and his army was massive whereas with less then 45,000 men Alexander defeated forces 1 million or more in open fields. Khan never fought a force 300 times larger then himself. He would have lost |
| wow. such long ... ( 4 hours ago by semiballpenman) |
| wow. such long comments... with no purpose... |
| they should go and ... ( 2 hours ago by zukuze) |
| they should go and write books lol |
| I know, right? XD ( 1 hour ago by XiaoXiaoMan1123) |
| I know, right? XD |
| Your answer still ... ( 1 hour ago by SAITOXIII) |
| Your answer still does not justify your racism, adding to the fact that you are more than a retard, but an ignorant fool. You speak of error and prejudice on behalf of your own premature act? Better yet you declared, insulting my gullibility which gives me the right to call you a retard no? I repeat again, Alexander was born a noble being passed on his father Phillip II's army and power. It doesn't matter how small his army was, he could have made it bigger. Genghis had NOTHING, people followed. |
| THIS IS SPARTA ( 40 minutes ago by OhSnapppXO) |
| THIS IS SPARTA |
Tell a friend: