Search Tags:

Categories:

Republican Joe Barton v. Al Gore



Uploaded by: Politicstv
Video Description:
Joe Barton and Al Gore exchange remarks at a congressional hearing (Mar. 21, 2007)


Tags for this video: al barton change climate global gore joe politicstv republican warming

Find more videos in the "News" category
See more videos uploaded by Politicstv

Related Videos
Al Gore Debates Global WarmingAl Gore on "An Inconvenient Truth"AL GORE: The Assault on Reason - 5.29.07 Full Speech
al-gore-debates-global-warming.htmlal-gore-debates-global-warming.htmlal-gore-debates-global-warming.html
Al Gore ignores eating meat global warmingAl Gore SnowjobAl Gore tallks about Global Warming and Solutions
al-gore-debates-global-warming.htmlal-gore-debates-global-warming.htmlal-gore-debates-global-warming.html


Share This Video:       StumbleUpon       del.icio.us       Reddit       digg       Furl       Spurl       Simpy       YahooMyWeb


Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Comments for this video on YouTube
What's the matter, ... ( 1 month ago by larilin)
What's the matter, Sketchmaker? Cat got your tounge? See, this is the thing with conspiracy theorists, once you confront them with real arguments, they run scared.
that is cute and ... ( 1 month ago by sketchmaker)
that is cute and all but you've already destroyed the basis of your argument.
according to the computer models used to show that warming is controlled with minor gases FIRST MUST CONCEDE THAT NO TEMP CHANGES IN PAST HISTORY OCCURED.
it is the only way that the modeling used shows global warming.
that is why it has been refered to as the 'hockey stick' model. IT MAKES NO SENCE AND YET WITHOUT IT THERE IS NO GLOBAL WARMING.
find something else or go put your head back in the sand.
tell me what you ... ( 1 month ago by sketchmaker)
tell me what you googled
Your ignorance is ... ( 1 month ago by larilin)
Your ignorance is only surpassed by your stupidity. What you are saying is simply not true. These computer models take into account past temperature changes. They take into account all possible factors that may influence the climate, that's what makes them so complex, which again makes you all confused and angry.
al gore has already ... ( 1 month ago by sketchmaker)
al gore has already stated on the record that it's ok to say what you need to in order to manilute people as long as it's for the right cause. that is not a direct quote but do some work and look it up.
This is very ... ( 1 month ago by larilin)
This is very revealing, you're obsessed with Al Gore and this is all about Republicans vs liberals to you. The point is that all scientific peer-reviewd literature over the last 15 years supports AWG. The leading climate scientist in the world have reviewed this literature and reached these conclusions in the IPCC report. And you don't accept it because of your political leanings.
You don't have a ... ( 1 month ago by larilin)
You don't have a single valid argument against it. All you have presented here are psedu arguments that are incredibly easy to refute.
no, for me this is ... ( 1 month ago by sketchmaker)
no, for me this is about a professor i had who told me that the global cooling scare that was going on while i was in college was a load of crap. he told me to wait ten years and they'll be screaming global warming next. he was off by ten years but HE WAS RIGHT!!!
i pulled up all the sources which were availible in order to prove him wrong and instead ended up changing my own mind.
all of the temp changes which have occured are WELL within normal variation.
Then wy this ... ( 1 month ago by larilin)
Then wy this obsession with AL Gore? You see, the point here is that if you look at the big picture we should be in a global cooling period now. Instead we are seeing steadily increasing global temperature (unless you're cherrie picking).
show me or tell me ... ( 1 month ago by sketchmaker)
show me or tell me what you googled in order to show any temp trend which was outside of normal variation.
we are talking about agw not what we already know is occuring in nature.
temp records go back over a hundred years so if your argument is valid it should be easy.
the video that this ... ( 1 month ago by sketchmaker)
the video that this is posted under is of al gore misusing data again to his advantage.
and, actually, the last major climate event that has taken place, from a historical perspective, has been an ice age. it would make sence that we should be looking at a slight ongoing temp increase.
between ice ages we know plants grew in areas much closer to the poles than they do now. it would follow that temps were higher. earth survived then, it will now.
" pulled up all the ... ( 1 month ago by larilin)
" pulled up all the sources which were availible in order to prove him wrong and instead ended up changing my own mind."
This suggests you're open-minded. Well, if that is really the case, check out these websites:
Youtube won't let ... ( 1 month ago by larilin)
Youtube won't let me post links to websites, how am I supposed to give you refrences?
I'll try sending it to you directly, ok?
Just a couple ... ( 1 month ago by larilin)
Just a couple comments:
No-one is (as far as I know) suggesting the earth won't survive. The point is that the climate will change so much so raplidly, and become so unstable, that it will adversely affect human living conditions as well as those of many other species.
EARTH CONTINUES TO ... ( 3 weeks ago by icecreamdose)
EARTH CONTINUES TO COOL Both September 2008 and October 2008 were slightly cooler than September 2007 and October 2007. The earth is not being warmed up by "manmade" co2. Al Gore is wrong.
"were slightly ... ( 2 weeks ago by pikechris1)
"were slightly cooler" as you say, slightly. thats nothing special if we consider the solar minimum. this is our last change to get back on track, after that we are f0cked... the slight difference will definitely melt the methane rich permafrost, we are already almost there now.
during the past 13 ... ( 6 days ago by mickdaniels1)
during the past 13 years there was no warming
TYF are you talkin ... ( 5 days ago by icecreamdose)
TYF are you talkin g about??? do you even know the first clue to what you are talking about?
yeah... im talking ... ( 5 days ago by pikechris1)
yeah... im talking about the measurements we have, you tool... you will see... s00n, very s00n...
What will I see? ... ( 5 days ago by icecreamdose)
What will I see? that the earth is cooling? glaciers in Alaska, New Zealand, Norway and California are growing. They are certainly growing in other places too--news stories will confirm this i'm sure. it looks like the Dalton Minimum that solar physicists said was coming is starting. The earth is not warming, it is cooling. Co2 is powerless to stop it. So go for a drive. Al Gore is wrong. Is it hard to believe that? Some think he is more than human and is never wrong.
idi0t... look at ... ( 5 days ago by pikechris1)
idi0t... look at the latest measurements... has nothing to do with al gore at all. i could link you to dozens of nasa and other hanky panky measurements sites that will prove you wrong. what you will see? you will see you are completely wrong. indeed you will... take that bet and we will meet here once in a while and will check the progress. :) however, it looks bad for you. i can tell you that. noaanews,noaaf,gov/stories2008/20081126_hurricaneseason,html
noaa and nasa both ... ( 5 days ago by icecreamdose)
noaa and nasa both use inaccurate data. They have an agenda. by the way, im not here to debate. If you think the earth is warming then fine. Theres been record cold all over the world for two years now. But there hasnt been record heat. You want to believe James Hansen? good for you.
idi0t... refute ... ( 5 days ago by pikechris1)
idi0t... refute their data, but not through rebuttals out of rhetoric, but publish in the peer reviewed journals... "by the way, im not here to debate" ok, i can accept that. "If you think the earth is warming then fine." oh, so its what i think... im not doing the measurements, nor im doing the peer review in this case. but i pretty well trust the system. it is "self-purifying". perhaps i should look deeper into the matter, but i doubt i will find there something supporting your position.
you havent seen any ... ( 5 days ago by icecreamdose)
you havent seen any reports record in the news over the last two years? where you been man?



Tell a friend:


URL 
Embed Code