SA-15 Gauntlet / Tor 9K330 Missile System
Uploaded by: galbaldy
Video Description:
The 9K331 Tor [SA-15 GAUNTLET land-based, SA-N-9 naval version] low-to-medium altitude SAM system is capable of engaging not only aircraft and helicopters but also RPVs, precision-guided weapons and various types of guided missiles. The HQ-17 is a copy of Tor-M1, that China will use it to replace the aging HQ-61 SAMs, will enter service around the year 2005. Although it is an autonomous system it can be interfaced into an integrated air defense network. SA-15b is designed to be a completely autonomous air defense system (at division level), capable of surveillance, command and control, missile launch and guidance functions from a single vehicle. The basic combat formation is the firing battery consisting of four TLARs and the Rangir battery command post. The TLAR carries eight ready missiles stored in two containers holding four missiles each. The SA-15b has the capability to automatically track and destroy 2 targets simultaneously in any weather and at any time of the day.
Effective range limits are from 1500 to 12000 m with target altitude limits being between 10 and 6000 m. The maximum maneuvering load factor limit on the weapon is 30 g. The missile launcher consists of a box container extending down below the level of the hull top, holding two groups of four re
ady to fire missiles in the vertical position. Each missile is in a maintenance-free factory-sealed container-launcher box. The system is reloaded by a dedicated transportation/loader vehicle. The 3D pulse Doppler electronically beam steered E/F-band surveillance radar provides range, azimuth, elev
ation and automatic threat evaluation data on up to 48 targets for the digital fire control computer processing system. Automatic track initiation can be performed on the 10 most dangerous targets, which are categorized and prioritized in order of threat for engagement. The operator reconfirms the h
ighest priority target choice and tracks this target before firing the missile. The maximum radar range is stated as 25 kilometers, but the rapid five to eight second reaction time [including fire control target prioritization] suggests a somewhat greater range. The radar antenna, on top of the turr
et, is swung through 90º to the horizontal position for travel. Target radar surveillance is carried out on the move but the vehicle would normally come to a halt for missile launch. The phased-array pulse Doppler G/H-band tracking radar is located at the front of the turret. This electronically s
teered radar is capable of simultaneously tracking two targets traveling at speeds of up to 700 km/h in all weather conditions, and countering threat ECM operations. The antenna assembly can be folded down for travel. Mounted on the top left of this radar is a small vertical pointing antenna which
serves to initially acquire the missile after launch before it is handed over to the main tracking/guidance system. On the lower right side of the tracking radar is an automatic TV tracking system with a range of 20000 m that complements the tracking radar and enables the system to operate in a heav
y ECM environment. The Tor is not amphibious although it is airportable. An NBC system is fitted as standard as is a built-in training system. The chassis of the vehicle is almost identical to that used for the 2S6 self-propelled hybrid air defense system and is based on the GM-569 tracked vehicle.
The three man crew consists of the vehicle commander, system operator and vehicle driver, seated at the front of the vehicle with the large box-like unmanned turret in the center and the engine compartment at the rear. This arrangement is similar to that of the Kub (SA-6) and Shilka (ZSU-23-4) vehi
cles. The vehicle suspension consists of six dual rubber tired roadwheels with the idler at the front, drive sprocket at the rear and three return rollers. An auxiliary gas turbine powers a 75 kW generator, allowing the main diesel engine to be shut down when the system is deployed to conserve fuel
.
Tags for this video: 9K330 AAA airdefense army artillery Gauntlet gun military missile PVO Russian SA-15 Soviet Tor U2
Find more videos in the "Howto" category
See more videos uploaded by galbaldy
| SA-12 S-300V Gladiator MIssile | ERYX Ooops! | Topol-M SS-27 Missile ICBM |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| The Brahmos Supersonic Cruise Missile (Part 2) | air defense ZSU-23 Shilka Tunguska | Valkyrie Missile |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Comments for this video: Show || Hide
| Comments for this video on YouTube |
| "where does it say ... ( 1 month ago by lordkirn) |
| "where does it say im american" err, when I click your name and go on your profile.. it says your country is the US.. so, american? |
| Redbaron14dude This ... ( 1 month ago by Raechowchow) |
| Redbaron14dude This is a forum discussing a specific missile system which was introduced into the Soviet service in the middle 80s. Why the hell you are here bringing this gorbach about WWII? You sound like a pissed off Nazi. If the Germans went to conquer Soviet Union without knowing their harsh winter climate they really should of stayed home and drink beer dumb ass. They made a huge strategic blunder and in the end they paid for it. But whose problem is that? Ours? |
| Redbaron14dude And ... ( 1 month ago by Raechowchow) |
| Redbaron14dude And in the end it was a red flag flying of the Reichstag building in Berlin in May of 45 and not anyone elses. That tells you whos up for a real fight and whos good at it. I have been in the professional military for 3 years, served my country. Let me ask you, what have you done for yours? Do us all a favor please go back and read some GOOD books about WW II and then come back with your laim comments on WW II forum, you idiot. |
| 1:03 - ... ( 1 month ago by adrrian92) |
| 1:03 - motherfucking cool . |
| it doesnt say im ... ( 1 month ago by Redbaron14dude) |
| it doesnt say im born there |
| yea i dont bring ... ( 1 month ago by Redbaron14dude) |
| yea i dont bring WWII up i look at a video then see someone saying something and ive read many WWII books that were good |
| Redbaron14dude ... ( 1 month ago by Raechowchow) |
| Redbaron14dude Really? If you read any GOOD ones you might just notice that the Allied Coalition including Soviet Union, Great Britain, and United States all together have brought the Nazis to its end. But as far as the absolute sucrifice goes it was the Soviet Union that paid the most horrible price-27 million dead, half of country destroyed, tortured, and burned down by the Nazis. Let me ask you, how many people did US loose? I KNOW, in the neigborhood of 460K. So next time think, ok? |
| If you cant get ... ( 1 month ago by Raechowchow) |
| If you cant get history right then try to wrestle some raw numbers dude, I know it is tough for some people. Saying that Russians sucked in WWII is the same thing as saying we didnt sucrifice enough people to save your countrys ass so that it could become a great place and prosper again. Thats while we still had to bury our dead and try to rebuild what is left from the ashes. Use some brain man, if we havent done that who would? US? Britain? Right, they all about that and self sucrifice too. |
| we all saw what the ... ( 1 month ago by KhanStodge) |
| we all saw what the russian sams did to american planes in vietnam. 8 of 10 jets did not returnt. Nuff said. |
| Hot damn! scary how ... ( 1 month ago by Highstar25) |
| Hot damn! scary how those missiles move, they're like fish |
| what language ( 1 month ago by calvinisgold) |
| what language |
| russian ( 1 month ago by canadianblargh) |
| russian |
| and americans are ... ( 1 month ago by MouseON) |
| and americans are creating anti missile defence system ;] russians had them for how long? =D Raechowchow very good point ;] at the end red flag was flying of the reichstag building in berlin, not us. anyway americans should shut up repeating "you'd speak german if not us", f you, u.s would speak german if not soviets. |
| Your figures are ... ( 1 month ago by bitrex) |
| Your figures are way off. The US suffered 0.4 losses per 1000 sorties - hardly 8 out of 10. The exact details of nearly every US aircraft loss in the Vietnam conflict are easily available on the Internet, from both the USAF and international sources, and widely agreed upon. No air force in the history of air combat has ever suffered anywhere near an 80% loss rate. Why do you make up obviously false statistics? |
| The US deployed an ... ( 1 month ago by bitrex) |
| The US deployed an anti-ballistic missile system comparable to the Soviet Galosh/Gazelle system ringing Moscow in the same period during the early 1970s - it was decommissioned after the US entered the ABM treaty with the Soviet Union. Though up to 2 ABM sites were allowed under the provisions of the treaty, US military strategists came to the conclusion that ABM systems in general were destabilizing to nuclear |
| Hit the wrong ... ( 1 month ago by bitrex) |
| Hit the wrong button, oops. Anyhow, strategists came to the belief that ABM systems were destabilizing to nuclear "game theory" and increased the chance of a spiraling arms race. My point is that the reason the US has not had an ABM system for 30 odd years was entirely political and strategic; not due to any technological inability. I assume that the former Soviet Union chose to build only one ABM site for similar reasons. |
| bitrex thats why I ... ( 4 weeks ago by Raechowchow) |
| bitrex thats why I just dont get their plans to put US missiles in Poland and Chech. I mean as a former navy guy I understand if US wants to start intimidating Russia again, but whos gonna win there? So in respond Russia put their missiles and bombers in Cuba..Sounds like no one learns from the past. It makes you wonder if people that make such decisions are sane sometime or should spend some time in the military just to understand the implications of it. |
| Very Good Machine ... ( 2 weeks ago by Afgayn) |
| Very Good Machine Long Live Russia |
| Really? What about ... ( 1 week ago by jamessmedley82) |
| Really? What about the 1967 Arab-Israeli War, when the IAF destroyed nearly the entire Egyptian Air Force jets even before they got the chance to get airborne,and inflicted similar casualties to the Syrian Air Force. You CAN achieve an 80% attrition rate when you have such asymmetry. |
| 3:30 good action! ( 1 week ago by arikat1) |
| 3:30 good action! |
| i have seen on you ... ( 1 week ago by polygamous1) |
| i have seen on you tube about us losses in vietnam n all expertx agree that what the Russians said years ago is turned out to be very accurate us loses over 2500 fighter planes n 1000 choppers on SOME sorties over N Vietnam atone time they were lossing well over half their planes sometimes up to 80% yes they they modified their aircraft defenceses n the SAMs became ineffective till the Russians upgraded their missiles n had a much better kill ration but they never acchived that ratio again |
| i believe Russia ... ( 1 week ago by polygamous1) |
| i believe Russia WILL destroy the missiles in Poland they gave NO choice is that or they be enslaved by the us unless they are prepaired to accept that n i really don't think so why wait till they are surrounded n be destroyed? might as well start bush's armagedon while they have a much better chance God forbid Russia goes so does the rest of humanity to the NWO americans too |
| fuck Russia and ... ( 1 week ago by americaneagle1967) |
| fuck Russia and that crap they call a military |
| fuck USA and that ... ( 1 day ago by ParamiliterWild) |
| fuck USA and that crap they call a military , Du Hurensohn ,fack deine fette Ami mama)) |
Tell a friend:













